Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Excavations.ie

2006:1639 - SLANE, Meath

NMI Burial Excavation Records

County: Meath

Site name: SLANE

Sites and Monuments Record No.: N/A

Licence number: 06E0341

Author: Matthew Seaver, CRDS Ltd.

Site type: Enclosure and Habitation site

Period/Dating: Early Medieval (AD 400-AD 1099)

ITM: E 697430m, N 774437m

Latitude, Longitude (decimal degrees): 53.710520, -6.524140

Missing Mapbox GL JS CSS

Preliminary testing of geophysical anomalies identified during a survey of the proposed route for the Slane bypass was undertaken in May 2006. The survey was carried out as part of the environmental impact assessment of the route. Geophysical survey of Areas 10 and 11 in Slane townland identified a number of anomalies indicating possible enclosures. This assessment was designed to test the geophysical results and to determine the depth and extent of any archaeological features encountered.

Area 10 contained a geophysical anomaly, suggesting a large rectangular enclosure some 50m in north–south diameter, which did not feature on the first-edition (1836) OS map. The enclosure was on a gradual north-facing slope and its eastern limit was defined by the townland boundary between Slane and Cashel townlands. Five trenches were excavated to assess this enclosure. The enclosure ditch was revealed in Trenches 1–3 and was sectioned in the two former trenches.

The ditch measured 3–3.5m in width and was up to 1.4m in depth. The basal deposit was greyish-brown silty sandy clay that contained sparse flecks of charcoal with relatively few stones and moderate amounts of animal bone, which was in poor condition. The deposit contained a lens of grey silty plastic clay with moderate amounts of animal bone. This was overlain by mid-brown silty sandy clay with few inclusions. The upper deposit was marked by dark-brown silty clay with frequent charcoal flecks.

No artefacts were recovered and the ditch contained largely poorly preserved animal bone. A linear gully, possibly contemporary with the main enclosure ditch, was excavated in Trench 1. This contained charred plant remains consisting of wheat, oat and barley. The interior contained relatively few features. Trench 5 contained a shallow pit with dark deposits containing animal bone and charcoal-rich soil which included cereal remains. The animal bone assemblage was small and included cattle and horse. A cow atlas from the enclosure ditch was dated to 660–820 cal AD (UB-7240). The rectangular enclosure in Area 10 is probably related to settlement remains, indicated by the animal bone found within. The proposed route will impact on the enclosure.

Area 11, to the south of Area 10, contained anomalies suggesting a potential circular enclosure associated with a series of linear features. The trenching of Area 11 did not confirm the presence of archaeological features corresponding with the geophysical anomaly. They uncovered outcropping bedrock in the north of Area 11, which may possibly account for the geophysical anomalies. However, these trenches only sampled a small part of the area covered by the anomalies and it was recommended that further investigations take place in Area 11 prior to road construction to further assess the geophysical survey results in this area.

Read More

en_USEN